that's between you and them. It does not affect Wikipedia. We're only concerned about copyright.
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Pharos <pharosofalexand...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Zev Sero <z...@sero.name> wrote: >> On 24/12/2010 12:56 PM, Elias Friedman wrote: >>> The new policy is still too restrictive for commons: >>> >>> "...we do insist that all images personally shot be used ONLY for personal >>> reference. They cannot be published for commercial use." >> >> They can say that, but why would anyone have to listen? On what authority >> do they purport to restrict what you do with the photos once you take them? >> If the objects you photograph are not themselves copyright, then the >> copyright on the photos belongs to you. > > Well, there is the issue of property and contract law, and whether > you're violating the "contract" that you got the admission and ticket > under. > > Thanks, > Richard > (User:Pharos) > >> -- >> Zev Sero The trouble with socialism is that you >> z...@sero.name eventually run out of other people’s money >> - Margaret Thatcher >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikimedia_NYC mailing list >> Wikimedia_NYC@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia_nyc >> > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia_NYC mailing list > Wikimedia_NYC@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia_nyc > -- David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG _______________________________________________ Wikimedia_NYC mailing list Wikimedia_NYC@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia_nyc