that's between you and them. It does not affect Wikipedia. We're only
concerned about copyright.

On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Pharos <pharosofalexand...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Zev Sero <z...@sero.name> wrote:
>> On 24/12/2010 12:56 PM, Elias Friedman wrote:
>>> The new policy is still too restrictive for commons:
>>>
>>> "...we do insist that all images personally shot be used ONLY for personal 
>>> reference. They cannot be published for commercial use."
>>
>> They can say that, but why would anyone have to listen?  On what authority
>> do they purport to restrict what you do with the photos once you take them?
>> If the objects you photograph are not themselves copyright, then the
>> copyright on the photos belongs to you.
>
> Well, there is the issue of property and contract law, and whether
> you're violating the "contract" that you got the admission and ticket
> under.
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
> (User:Pharos)
>
>> --
>> Zev Sero                      The trouble with socialism is that you
>> z...@sero.name                 eventually run out of other people’s money
>>                                                      - Margaret Thatcher
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia_NYC mailing list
>> Wikimedia_NYC@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia_nyc
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia_NYC mailing list
> Wikimedia_NYC@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia_nyc
>



-- 
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia_NYC mailing list
Wikimedia_NYC@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia_nyc

Reply via email to