On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 06:44:41PM +1100, Angela Beesley wrote: > 2009/2/21 Sarah Ewart <[email protected]>: > > > If two or more members use the tag "DEFER TO MEETING" in their comments, > > resolutions on the topic may not be passed by the wiki method, and must be > > brought to a real-time committee meeting. > > Why does this need 2 people? If one person thinks the topic needs > further discussion, why not do that and try to come to a consensus on > the issue after the discussion? Without it, people may be making the > wrong decision when they cast their votes. > > Angela
It is not about further discussion really. That is a given. The wiki discussion continues until the wording of the resolution is agreed. It then goes to a vote. I think it is then reasonable for it to be 2 members who defer the vote to a meeting. The key is getting consensus on what we want to vote on. Brian. _______________________________________________ > Wikimediaau-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l -- Brian Salter-Duke [email protected] [[User:Bduke]] is single user account with en:Wikipedia main account. Also on Meta-Wiki, Wikiversity, fr:Wikipedia and others. Treasurer, Wikimedia Australia Inc, Go Wikimedia Australia Inc, Go! _______________________________________________ Wikimediaau-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l
