I've done a small amount of mapping sculptures and the like in OSM, but
mostly have been feeling a bit confused about the current state of the
art of linking Wikidata coordinate info and OSM features! :-( It's
certainly not limited to artworks.
It seems the best route is to put the WD ID into a feature's attributes
on OSM, and then let a bot update WD with the coordinates; all other
metadata can then live in WD. It should also be reasonable easy to get
list of art that's missing from WD but present in OSM.
I think tourism=artwork
<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dartwork> is the most
widely-used tag in OSM (corresponds to Q838948
<https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q838948>, "work of art"), here's an
example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1253343627 and the most
common other attributes used with it
<https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/?key=tourism&value=artwork#combinations>.
My general feeling is that spatial data in OSM is more likely to be kept
up to date than that in WD, whereas /other/ metadata is vice versa.
—sam
On 28/09/16 10:00, Leigh Blackall wrote:
Hi folks,
Since hosting Andy Mabbett to talk about Wikidata at RMIT Uni, we've
been percolating a possible project involving Australian public art to
Wikidata for (among other things) geolocated data and information...
is anyone working much with this sort of thing?..
--
--
Leigh Blackall <http://about.me/leighblackall>
+61(0)404561009
_______________________________________________
Wikimediaau-l mailing list
Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l
_______________________________________________
Wikimediaau-l mailing list
Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l
