Esse é a mais recente wiki-novela envolvendo a relação entre a comunidade e a WMF:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Superprotect_rights Por mais errada que possa ter sido a atitude por parte de um funcionário da WMF (não vi os detalhes), é impressionante o grau de agressividade de alguns voluntários em alguns momentos. A WP PT já deve estar sabendo, pois fiquei sabendo via José Ribeiro num tópico da esplanada sobre o encontro do fim do mês. Mas divulgando aqui a quem interessar possa. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: John Mark Vandenberg <jay...@gmail.com> Date: 2014-08-10 14:29 GMT-03:00 Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikitech-l] Superprotect user right, Comming to a wiki near you To: Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedi...@lists.wikimedia.org> On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 10:08 PM, MZMcBride <z...@mzmcbride.com> wrote: > David Gerard wrote: >>On 10 August 2014 15:51, MZMcBride <z...@mzmcbride.com> wrote: >>> You'd been threatening to implement super-protection for a long time. I >>> see you finally made good on this very bad idea. This is certainly bold, >>> but also incredibly reckless. Your response to being told "we don't like >>> your software" is to try shove it down a wiki community's throat? >> >>I thought this was a response to someone hamfistedly editing en:wp's >>JS and *actually breaking it*. When Erik reverted this change and said >>"don't break the damn wiki", the response was "but we can so we should >>be able to!" and an attempt to take the Foundation to en:wp >>arbitration. The obvious response is to make it so that such >>blithering stupidity can't be enacted again. > > Super-protection was implemented in response to the German, not English, > Wikipedia. It turns out that multiple communities don't like MediaViewer. > > Erik is squarely responsible for the mess being made here and deserves the > full blame and consequences. He instigated the arbitration case on the > English Wikipedia and he's now instigating a war with the German Wikipedia. > > The German Wikipedia community has looked at and evaluated MediaViewer and > has decided that it doesn't want MediaViewer enabled on its wiki. Erik has > made it his mission to force MediaViewer on the German Wikipedians (and > the Commoners), using system administrators and community advocates and > anyone else he can coerce. This is unacceptable behavior on Erik's part. > MediaViewer is an entirely supplementary feature, not some fundamental or > critical piece of infrastructure in desperate need of protection. As this has wide-ranging implications, I have started an RFC on meta https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Superprotect_rights -- John Vandenberg _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines wikimedi...@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> -- Everton Zanella Alvarenga (also Tom) Open Knowledge Brasil - Rede pelo Conhecimento Livre http://br.okfn.org
_______________________________________________ WikimediaBR-l mailing list WikimediaBR-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediabr-l