Ilario Valdelli wrote:

> The Bylaws should be not ambiguous. I suggest to define better the
> word "share" in point 2.2 adding another sentence more careful.

I am not against a clarification. We could indicate that the Wikimedia
CH "shares the objectives of WMF, as they are defined at the time of
creation of the Association" (which would require us to doublecheck the
exact content of these objectives during the foundation meeting), making
sure that we are not bound by any subsequent modification ?

Cheers,

Frederic
_______________________________________________
Wikimediach-l mailing list
Wikimediach-l@Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l

Reply via email to