<snip>
Do you - or someone else - have any plans to add these at some point in
time?
</snip>


Yes very much. I am preparing a blog post based on these numbers. Infact for
the past 1.5 years we are publishing an analysis based on these numbers in
Malayalam wiki mailing list each month.

I know the current information is not "analysis". But I hope it will improve
as we move forward based on the valuable inputs from all of you.

Siebrand, Erik,

I have noticed that in all the statistics tables at different
locations,   *Bhojpuri
language* is representented as *Bihari*. But Bhojupuri is one of the *Bihari
languages (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bihari_languages)*. Other Bihari
languages are : Angika <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angika_language>  *·*
Bhojpuri <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhojpuri>  *·* Fiji
Hindi<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiji_Hindi>
*·* 
Kudmali<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kudmali&action=edit&redlink=1>
*·* Magahi <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magahi>  *·*
Maithili<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maithili_language>
*·* Majhi <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majhi_language>  *·*
Musasa<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musasa_language>
*·* 
Panchpargania<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Panchpargania&action=edit&redlink=1>
*·* Sadri <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sadri_language>  *·* Sadri,
Oraon<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sadri_language>
*·* Sarnami Hindustani <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarnami>  *·*
Surajpuri<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Surajpuri&action=edit&redlink=1>
*·* Vajjika <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vajjika_language>

Please see whether this information needs to updated.


Thank you

Shiju


On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:39 AM, Siebrand Mazeland <s.mazel...@xs4all.nl>wrote:

> Hi Shiju Alex,
>
> *very* nice overview in numbers.
>
> You’re calling it an ‘analysis’. Usually I expect some prose with an
> analysis – reasoning, assumptions and conclusions.
>
> Do you - or someone else - have any plans to add these at some point in
> time? Currently each reader has to go through all the tables, make his own
> observations, mix in some assumptions and distill conclusions from those. I
> truly understand that commenting on numbers is probably even more work than
> gathering them in the current format in the first place.
>
> It could however be very valuable – and a great discussion starter – if
> someone would comment on the numbers say every 6 months. It would also allow
> readers of the report to just read the words, and have the tables as an
> annex.
>
> Next steps could be to add goals, strategies to archieve them, and assess
> the goals and strategies later on, based on this type of report.
>
> Comments?
>
> Siebrand
>
> From: wikimediaindia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:
> wikimediaindia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Shiju Alex
> Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 7:29 PM
> To: wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Subject: [Wikimediaindia-l] Indian language Wikipedias - Statistical report
> - 2010 January
>
> Hello All
>
> Please see the PDF file available at the location
> http://shijualexonline.googlepages.com/2010_01_january_en.pdf for a
> detailed statistical analysis of the Indian language wikipedias for the
> month of 2010 January.
>
> <snip>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
> Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l

Reply via email to