Good work Mayur. It will be more better if interested wikimedians write
their analysis about this survey. Each wikimedian can derive various
analysis from this report.


The quality factor can be improved/refined if we include/exclude various
parameters. One important parameter that I would like to see as part of this
is *the Localization statistics*.

For non-latin wikis the article size of 0.5 kb or 2 kb is negligible. A
higher size need to be included (for the reports published at
http://stats.wikimedia.org) for better comparison of non-latin language
wikis.

Shiju




On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 7:18 PM, mayur <mayur...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes, I choose many important factors that was available in wikimedia stats,
> The formula was derived by me but as a past student of economics i tried to
> do my best, basically i marked each factor on the scale of 100 so that no
> factor alone may affect the whole survey.
>
> Thank you
>
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Ravishankar <ravidre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Mayur,
>>
>> Interesting analysis. Thanks for the hard work.
>>
>> Is there any academic reference based on which the formula was arrived or
>> is it empirical?
>>
>> One possible indicator for a Wikipedia's quality may be offline activisim
>> / organizing as it indicates the community's rapport which is very vital for
>> overall quality control. Things like meetups, releasing CD etc.,
>>
>> Ravi
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
>> Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
> Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l

Reply via email to