here is the another example as above
http://hi.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E0%A4%95%E0%A5%8C%E0%A4%B6%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%AE%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AC%E0%A5%80_%E0%A4%9C%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%B2%E0%A4%BE&action=history

On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:32 AM, mayur <mayur...@gmail.com> wrote:

> In reply to your comment "I would like to see few bot created stub article
> in any Indian language Wikipedia, later enhanced by IPs or new users"
>
> Here is a link for a stub article which was a stub in 2006 (
> http://hi.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E0%A4%AB%E0%A4%A4%E0%A5%87%E0%A4%B9%E0%A4%AA%E0%A5%81%E0%A4%B0_%E0%A4%9C%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%B2%E0%A4%BE&oldid=28357
> )
>
> And see its latest revision in 2011 (
> http://hi.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A4%AB%E0%A4%A4%E0%A5%87%E0%A4%B9%E0%A4%AA%E0%A5%81%E0%A4%B0_%E0%A4%9C%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%B2%E0%A4%BE
> )
>
> this article was edited by 100 of times per its history and it got enlarged
> to 32kb from 1kb. you can see all article in this category grew from their
> stubs.
>
> That's why hindi wiki supports Jimmy Wales statement of creation of stub
> articles.
>
> Thank youand Regards
> Mayur
>
>   On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 9:31 PM, mayur <mayur...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> In Reply to your 2nd comment, We have done this after looking a detailed
>> analysis.You can yourself check
>> http://hi.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%B6%E0%A5%87%E0%A4%B7:AbuseLog&wpSearchFilter=8such
>>  avoided article.Most((95% or more) are vandalized articles.Thats why we
>> banned on them because many users simply enter randomly buttons to create
>> any article which is clearly observed in the list as shown in above link.
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 9:26 PM, mayur <mayur...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I think stub articles are not a bad idea if they contain small
>>> information bcoz atleast they contain some infomation, every article starts
>>> from a small version, and also if anybody interested in reading a article in
>>> hindi he may also come through it by en wiki inter links or Now a days many
>>> internet users know to write in Devanagari because Google provide such kind
>>> of facility.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Shiju Alex 
>>> <shijualexonl...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>>  *Jimmy Wales mentioned how stub articles on the populated places in
>>>>> United States drove the growth of English Wikipedia. **People hailing
>>>>> from these places would google their hometowns and arrive at Wikipedia.
>>>>> *
>>>>>
>>>> *
>>>> *
>>>> This might be true for English or European language wikipedias. But a
>>>> very example to follow for Indian wiki communities.
>>>>
>>>> *A typical scenario.*
>>>>
>>>> A normal Indian user search for an article about his home town in
>>>> internet (*by typing in his mother language script*), find an article
>>>> about it *in the respective language wikipedia*, click the edit button,
>>>> and then enhance it.
>>>>
>>>> Highly improbable!!!   To reach that stage, normal Indian users need to
>>>> cross lot of hurdles (awareness, willingness, fonts, rendering issues,
>>>> typing tools, and so on) . Very rarely, experienced wikipedians in the
>>>> respective language wikipedia may enhance it. The chances of even that is
>>>> very less in Indian Wikipedias. Just check this list itself. How many hyper
>>>> active English language wikipedians (Indians) edited in their respective
>>>> mother language wikipedia? If this is the case with experienced editors we
>>>> do not to mention about non-wiki users. From last year's 
>>>> statistics<http://shijualex.wordpress.com/2011/02/27/indian-language-wikipedias-2010-statistical-report/>we
>>>>  know the community strength of different Indian language wikipedias.
>>>>
>>>> I would like to see few *bot created stub article* in any Indian
>>>> language Wikipedia, later *enhanced by IPs or new users*.* Increasing
>>>> the article count without building the community will be very bad for any
>>>> Indian Wikipedia*. If we have a big community to work on the rest of
>>>> the tasks after the article creation, then there is no harm in creating 
>>>> stub
>>>> articles using bots in a systematic way. I think Tamil wikipedians had done
>>>> this.
>>>>
>>>> Utkarsh pointed to some others issues also in the blogpost.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Situation will change as more people become aware about the language
>>>> computing tools of the respective language. But at that time if  they get a
>>>> wiki with articles highly disorganized, it is not going to help anyone.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Shiju
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> **
>>>>  On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 8:09 PM, mayur <mayur...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I think that were stub articles, there is nothng wrong in creating stub
>>>>> articles by bot.As per Jimmy wales "*There’s nothing wrong with the
>>>>> idea of generating articles on populated places using bots. During one of
>>>>> his recent visits to India, Jimmy Wales mentioned how stub articles on the
>>>>> populated places in United States drove the growth of English Wikipedia.
>>>>> People hailing from these places would google their hometowns and arrive 
>>>>> at
>>>>> Wikipedia. They would then start adding the missing details to these
>>>>> articles, becoming active contributors in the process."
>>>>>
>>>>> That why hindi wiki had such kind of stub articles, These article were
>>>>> generated just before utkarsh's analysis.Unfortunately they got some error
>>>>> due to some bot script error. We were already aware of that.Due to some
>>>>> factual errors these articles were deleted instantaneously. In last 4 
>>>>> month
>>>>> hindi wiki has deleted about 20,000 such kind of stub articles per our
>>>>> community discussion.We have also banned creation of very short article
>>>>> through a abuse filter which has not allowed about 2000 article creation 
>>>>> for
>>>>> last 3 months.Giving a little information about any article is not bad as 
>>>>> it
>>>>> contain information but as these recently  created **Village **article
>>>>> got some errors due to error in bot script and incorrect information 
>>>>> that's
>>>>> why we deleted such type of articles immediately.Such kind of articles are
>>>>> present in many big wikis.I am happy after deleting 20,000 such kind of
>>>>> article hindi wiki still have 80,000 articles.We want our wiki growth in 
>>>>> all
>>>>> dimensions not only in no of articles.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you and Regards
>>>>> Mayur
>>>>> Hindi Wikipedian
>>>>> *
>>>>>  On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Ravishankar <ravidre...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://ut7.in/2011/03/quantity-over-quality-the-sad-story-of-hindi-wikipedia/
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
>>>>>> Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
>>>>> Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
>>>> Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l

Reply via email to