Hmm....I guess the choice is personal here - "copyrightable" captures that well. And if a copyright is chosen, perhaps "sweat of the brow" reasoning applies? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sweat_of_the_brow). anyways, the license chosen in this case is not restrictive.
On 29-Jun-2011, at 11:46 AM, Gautam John <gau...@prathambooks.org> wrote: > On 29 June 2011 15:15, Ashwin Baindur <ashwin.bain...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> We have many people who scan images from books, etc. In those cases we give >> copyright as applicable, as public domain if they are old. Is the case >> different in case we take photos from art? > > Very much! A picture of the Mona Lisa is copyrightable. Even if the > painting of the Mona Lisa is out of copyright. > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimediaindia-l mailing list > Wikimediaindiaemail@example.com > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l _______________________________________________ Wikimediaindia-l mailing list Wikimediaindiafirstname.lastname@example.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l