It's an interesting point. A photograph of a piece of art or heritage cannot
logically* claim copyright, but what about a picture of a friend standing in
front of said piece of art/heritage?

*but then again, logic and copyright often do not occupy the same space and
time

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Ashwin Baindur <ashwin.bain...@gmail.com>wrote:

> We have many people who scan images from books, etc. In those cases we give
> copyright as applicable, as public domain if they are old. Is the case
> different in case we take photos from art?
>
> Warm regards,
>
> Ashwin Baindur
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Gautam John <gau...@prathambooks.org>wrote:
>
>> On 29 June 2011 15:00, Ashwin Baindur <ashwin.bain...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Yann, these images should be licensed as being in public domain as of
>> now.
>> > How come you have claimed copyright?
>>
>> Because he took them?
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Gautam
>> ________
>> http://social.prathambooks.org/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
>> Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
> Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l
>
>


-- 
Vickram
Fool On The Hill <http://communicall.wordpress.com>
_______________________________________________
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l

Reply via email to