+1 for Eric and Barry.

Though we can list benefits like better writing skills, networking with
similar people, global audience for our content, it is very hard to make
someone a returning contributor based on these. Global / Indian education
program is a good example. Even after intense and direct outreach, the
conversion rate there is less.

I have done 10+ physical outreaches and the conversion rate is very very
less. Outreaches are very much a branding exercise to increase awareness
about Wikipedia. Not everyone can and will become a poet or a musician or
an environmentalist or a human rights activist even if we do 100s of
workshops. The same holds true for Wikipedia.

Wikipedia is a social cause in which the right contributor finds joy
instantly. It is similar to the joy a kid feels at seeing a ball. You need
not educate a kid about the ball but you just have to introduce it. People
asking "what's in it for me in Wikipedia" are similar to people who ask
"what's in it for playing". Almost 90% of very active Tamil Wikipedia
editors jumped at the project once such a thing existed.

So, we should not worry about the people who ask "Why". Just spread the
message to as many people by mass media ( *Even a TV ad campaign will be
worth the spending* ) and focus on the people who ask "How". There are many
such people who can relate with the cause of Wikipedia but they just don't
know that it exists and they can contribute.

Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit 

Reply via email to