On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Anirudh Bhati <anirudh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:02 AM, Amir E. Aharoni > <amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il> wrote: >> >> If he didn't explain it, then you can presume that it's wrong. There's >> nothing to discuss, and there's nothing wrong with saying "Indic >> languages". > > > The word "Indic" refers generally to the Indo-Aryan family of languages, > which does not include Dravidian languages prevalent in Southern India.
factually incorrect . Read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brahmic_scripts > Hence, bunching the entire system of Dravidian languages together with the > Indo-Aryan languages in India may seem derogatory to some, and reasonably > so. cant understand this part . Do you mean Aryan supremacy ? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aryan_race ? Anivar _______________________________________________ Wikimediaindia-l mailing list Wikimediaindiafirstname.lastname@example.org To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l