On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Anirudh Bhati <anirudh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:02 AM, Amir E. Aharoni
> <amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il> wrote:
>> If he didn't explain it, then you can presume that it's wrong. There's
>> nothing to discuss, and there's nothing wrong with saying "Indic
>> languages".
> The word "Indic" refers generally to the Indo-Aryan family of languages,
> which does not include Dravidian languages prevalent in Southern India.

factually incorrect .
Read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brahmic_scripts

> Hence, bunching the entire system of Dravidian languages together with the
> Indo-Aryan languages in India may seem derogatory to some, and reasonably
> so.

cant understand this part . Do you mean Aryan supremacy ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aryan_race ?


Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit 

Reply via email to