On 14 February 2013 19:31, Theo10011 <de10...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If you read again, I questioned, denoted by a question mark - if achal
> *still* serves on their board and if there was still an association. I asked
> still, because I knew he did at one point and I don't follow either of them.
Which is why I said "Your caveats notwithstanding."
> What assertions? He *did* serve on their board, he just quit some time ago.
> I don't follow achal or CIS's internal structure.
"As far as I know achal still serves on your board?" or "Does Achal
still serve on your board?". Weasel wording will take you places.
> You are getting awfully defensive here for achal, for asking a direct
> question if Achal was still on their board or not.
Oooh! Look! A red herring!
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit