On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Gautam John <gau...@akshara.org.in> wrote:

> On 14 February 2013 19:31, Theo10011 <de10...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > If you read again, I questioned, denoted by a question mark -  if achal
> > *still* serves on their board and if there was still an association. I
> asked
> > still, because I knew he did at one point and I don't follow either of
> them.
> Which is why I said "Your caveats notwithstanding."

> > What assertions? He *did* serve on their board, he just quit some time
> ago.
> > I don't follow achal or CIS's internal structure.
> "As far as I know achal still serves on your board?" or "Does Achal
> still serve on your board?". Weasel wording will take you places.

Jeez!? You think that is weasel wording. Fine, let's say I assumed he was
still on the board. Boy, was I wrong! It was the worst accusation ever! He
should be here demanding an apology for that defamation himself. How dare I!

> > You are getting awfully defensive here for achal, for asking a direct
> > question if Achal was still on their board or not.
> Oooh! Look! A red herring!

I'm getting awfully tired by your point, if you make it one of these days.
I'm not sure if you defending achal's reputation by repeatedly pointing out
that he quit the board or just chose a weak point to begin with. So, saying
that you are getting defensive is a red herring now? I don't see you
defending anyone else here....or anywhere.

Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit 

Reply via email to