This percept by Pradeep at proposal talk page sums it up;

//I see no point in community engagement with this proposal to improve it
without the knowledge of WMF's assessment. Trying to make improvements
without any idea of the feedback will just lead to poor quality. Also, I do
not see the need for this public grant application process when pretty much
everything else seems to be behind closed doors. I believe you (& WMF) will
have a better idea on whether to fund this proposal or not based on your
internal appraisal of the performance of CIS-A2K than community members
here who have seen only the plan and only parts of the implementation of
the programme by CIS-A2K for which they were already funded.
Prad2609<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Prad2609>
 (talk <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Prad2609>) 18:41, 17
April 2014 (UTC) //

There are still many questions to be answered by CIS and WMF. Thanks Ravi
for your work there, at least this way we will have some transparency!
Thanks.

Ansuman




On 18 April 2014 18:10, Ravishankar <ravidre...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Dhaval,
>
> Asaf has been answering questions on these lines and the discussion is
> continuing at
>
>
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants_talk:APG/Proposals/2013-2014_round2/The_Centre_for_Internet_and_Society/Proposal_form#Q3a.
>  Follow the questions Q3b and Q3c too.
>
> Let us please participate in the on-wiki discussion there.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ravi
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
> Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit 
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l

Reply via email to