-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
> A few years ago, I had asked that IRC have a searchable archive of
> discussions.  I was told that there were daily logs and I could get one
> if I asked.  I asked, and was denied.  Until IRC commits itself to
> openness, it should have little to no impact on any facet of our
> project.  Without searchable archives, IRC is not open in the modern
> sense, regardless of who or how you can join it, or view it.  The
> archives of this mailing list are searchable.
>  
> Will Johnson
>  

Perhaps you should get involved. Come to the meeting, and maybe we can
discuss this issue.

There are arguments for and against publicly logging channels, and I'd
love to hear your input on this issue. We have considered the question
in the past, but to my knowledge there was no agreement on any change.
If you want that to change, you'll have to convince people.

For what it's worth, I think publicly logging in public channels is a
good idea. You're not alone in your views, so let's see if we can hammer
something out.

Thanks,
- -Mike
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkp00XIACgkQst0AR/DaKHvtzgCeIC/KNTsGX9lnV7T/5ZwlQXfp
qqMAn3PcNJgV23g28F3K/YaffKe457zJ
=Z5qA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Wikimediameta-l mailing list
Wikimediameta-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediameta-l

Reply via email to