2009/6/25 geni <geni...@gmail.com>:
> 2009/6/25 Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com>:
>> 2009/6/25 Michael Peel <em...@mikepeel.net>:
>>>> From: Ian Hawkins <ian.hawk...@gmail.com>
>>>> It's rare to find anything other than top-down structures in business,
>>>> banking, the media, education etc. I wondered if Wikipedia is a great
>>>> example of a more open and democratic structure.
>> Controversial topic! Wikipedians can't generally agree on how
>> democratic Wikipedia is currently or how democratic it should be in
>> the future. Doing justice to the topic will probably take longer than
>> the couple of minutes I expect he's after. Personally, I wouldn't want
>> to step on that particular ants nest without doing justice to it, so
>> I'm afraid I will decline.
> Might be worth emailing him to point out that per policy wikipedia is
> not a democracy and see if he realises what he is getting into.

Yes, I agree. We should let him know that the answer isn't going to be
anything simple.

(If anyone is interested in this topic, there is a discussion on the
future governance of Wikipedia going on here:


The discussion is focuses around deciding if we need to have a more
formal discussion about the issues. [Don't be frightened away by the
fact that it is in Giano's userspace, it's being held with an amazing
amount of maturity and courtesy by all parties.])

Wikimedia UK mailing list
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to