Take a look at [[MOS:INTRO]] for why it's the length it is.

> cool article, summary/introduction too long. summary should be made short
> and concise. i can't figure out why refs are starting numbering at 6 in
> the summary section. I will give it a few minutes.
>
> [[user_talk:Ecoman24]], formerly [[user:fngosa]]
>
>
> --- On Wed, 10/14/09, u7...@students.keele.ac.uk
> <u7...@students.keele.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> From: u7...@students.keele.ac.uk <u7...@students.keele.ac.uk>
> Subject: [Wikimediauk-l]  A request for assistance.
> To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Date: Wednesday, October 14, 2009, 3:36 AM
>
> Hey everyone,
>    I realise this probably isn't the proper place to ask, but I'm in need
> of some assistance. I've been working on [[International Space
> Station]] for about three years now, and it's really close to finally
> being able to pass FAC. Unfortunately, it needs a good strong copyedit
> to "make it say what it means and mean what it says", and I'm so
> indoctrinated by the prose I can't do a good job. Requests to the
> overworked Guild of Copyeditors haven't worked, so I was wondering if
> one of the wonderful WMUK folks fancies taking a look at it and boldly
> sorting out my geeky prose? :-)
>
> James Humphreys (Colds7ream)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
>
>
>
>       _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
>



_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to