On 2 Dec 2009, at 20:23, geni wrote:

> I see no problem with the court's or WMF's actions. Slightly worried
> about the attempt by the plaintiff to prevent the WMF's name from
> being released but the court didn't grant that I can understand why
> that might have been attempted.

Um... that's not how I read it. I read it as the court considering  
requiring no press coverage of the order at all - but deciding  
against that. Nothing about preventing the WMF's name from being  
released...

Mike


_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to