On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 17:13 +0000, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> 2009/12/6 Brian McNeil <[email protected]>:
> > Mmmm? Do you make a habit of telling children aged eleven they can look
> > things up on a website with pictures of an adult performing
> > autofellatio?
> 
> Personally, I am very sceptical that such things are harmful to
> children. However, that is irrelevant. The question was about helping
> students use Wikipedia more effectively by correctly determining the
> reliability of different claims. Wikipedia for Schools doesn't help
> with that so it not a helpful suggestion.

I agree with you about being sceptical of such "moral outrage". When I
was that age it was the prissy parents whinging about kids looking up
"penis" in the dictionary. ;-)


However, kids that age are smart enough to work from Wikipedia for
schools (vetted and dumbed down) to comparing with Wikipedia and seeing
why certain information is taken out or considered dubious.

Perhaps one of the most important "sum of all knowledge" aspects
Wikipedia can offer is an ability to be appropriately sceptical. A good
transition through the education system does that; you start with the
basics and work up to real research work where you need to recognise a
significant or credible report.


-- 
Brian McNeil 
<[email protected]>|http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Brian_McNeil
Content of this message in no way represents the opinions or official position
of the Wikimedia Foundation or any of its projects.
* Problems replying? Forward bounces to [email protected] to raise with Godaddy 
Hosting.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to