2009/12/6 WereSpielChequers <[email protected]>: > Aside from the possibility that London might want to be a chapter, I > would have thought that organising subchapters by language would be at > least as relevant as geographical ones. We have wikis for Scots and at > least three celtic languages, plus perhaps Bangla and other languages? > > I see no reason why we can't cut this cake in several different > dimensions, depending on whats relevant to the task in hand.
Chapters are supposed to be geographic in range rather than linguistic. I guess there is no reason why we can't use different rules for subchapters, though. For the most part languages follow geographic lines anyway, it's just immigrant languages that don't. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
