Gordon Joly wrote:
> I feel the programme was {{unref}}'ed....
>
> For example, it seemed to suggest that Jimbo was responsible as Editor
> in Chief.
>
Dah, considering the number of obvious mistakes even in good coverage of
WP, that is more of a misinterpretation. [[Editor in chief]] seems to
believe there is a definition, but I had the impression it was a title
that could mean anything or nothing (quite apt for Jimbo, therefore).
More to the point really was that this was a classic Middle England
presentation taking for granted that WP issues weren't just a reason for
people to turn off the radio, then ring up and complain. We've come a
long way ...
Charles
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
