Brian McNeil: > And this is an argument for what, exactly? No argument; I'm merely pointing out that a direct comparison between WM-UK and the NT might be misleading, since their fundraising methods and goals are quite different.
> You trimmed all the positive points I made to denigrate the proposal by
> insinuating I'm advocating sky-high membership fees.
I've read my post again, and I really can't see how you came to this
conclusion. I trimmed the rest of your post because it wasn't relevant to
the point I was making. I insinuated nothing. I have expressed no opinion
on either side of the discussion, so I have no reason to do so.
In fact, in the very text I quoted, you indicated that you found the NT
membership fee to be "a little steep". I find it unlikely that someone
would read this text and come to the conclusion that you believe WM-UK
should charge as much for membership.
- river.
PS: "Assume good faith" might be a little trite, but it's not a bad idea.
pgpQ2SWYf0uAX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
