Geni

This is an excelent idea - of course if we mounted a bar code as well and
they had wi fi or internet phone carrying customers then we could use Google
Goggles and supply it in different languages....

I tried suggesting this at one museum and I got the impression that they
were worried about "doing their job" of course they can use our text and
take nearly all the credit for just doing a print.

Roger

On 31 January 2011 23:39, geni <[email protected]> wrote:

> I was recently in the Portsmouth natural history museum (or as the
> natives call it Cumberland House). When I was there I saw this:
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/58992329@N03/5406060116/
>
> If you look at the text in the right column (may need to view image at
> full size) you will find that it is not only dated (it's treating 1982
> as recent)  but is treating the [[Almas (cryptozoology)]] thing
> seriously. The museum doesn't really have any money so this isn't
> something that is likely to be fixed by them any time soon.
>
> I think offering to replace it with wikipedia based text along the
> lines of say [[User:Geni/museum_sign]]  would fall within 7-8 of:
>
> http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Business_Plan#Mission_and_Objectives
>
> I don't know how much doing such a replacement would cost but I would
> be surprised if it passed the limit of our micro grant program.
> Wikimedia-UK would need to be involved to cover use of the logo and
> the like.
>
> ==Advantages==
>
> *Museum gets a better sign
> *New way to spread wikipedia content
> *Gives us the chance to produce a real world example of the type of
> signs we would like to see (QR code and the like)
> *Helps draw attention to gaps in Wikipedia (in this case it failed to
> mention how much Neanderthals weigh)
> *It may get us some good will with the Portsmouth museum service which
> since they hold one of the larger collections of ship paintings could
> be kinda handy
> *May get us some new editors who are interested in working on such signs.
> *It's a concrete real world activity that we can point to as an
> example of what we are doing.
>
> ==Disadvantages==
>
> *Might be more expensive than expected
> *Images are an issue in this case (need to check copyright status of
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Homo_neanderthalensis_models
> )
> *Scale we can do this on is limited both financially and finding
> people to write such signs
>
> ==Neutral==
>
> *They might say no
>
> --
> geni
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
>



-- 
Roger Bamkin
(aka Victuallers)
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to