On 8 February 2011 00:12, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 8 February 2011 00:06, Deryck Chan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Yes, indeed I think the main problem is that such first-hand information > > from the subject of the article are unlikely to be backed by third-party > > reliable sources, which is why I think OTRS is the best way to do it - > using > > BLP rules to circumvent the usual verifiability guidelines. > > > If the inaccurate material is verified by sources that are as > "reliable" as the typical newspaper, the BLP patrol will still hack it > to pieces. Set Scott MacDonald on it, he wields the Holy Flamethrower > of Crappy BLPs ;-D > > > Delete http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Lulu_Popplewell
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
