I believe the applicable case law is Arkell v. Pressdram. On 21 May 2011 20:10, "Brian McNeil" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 19:49 +0100, James Farrar wrote: >> I heard an except from an interview with Jimbo on BBC London radio >> this afternoon; paraphrasing, his attitude was because the name has >> been named in reliable US sources, US editors will ensure it stays in >> enwiki. > > Something I stumbled across today: > > http://www.city-law.net/news/2010/Wikipedia_article.htm > > So, it'll stay in - sure. However, someone in the US may well have to > ask for legal assistance (EFF, ACLU?) in - via the Foundation - telling > an out-of-touch man in a white, powdered wig and dress to,.... "eff > orf!". > > > -- > Brian McNeil. > -- > [email protected] | Wikinews Accredited Reporter. > http://en.wikinews.org | http://www.wikinewsie.org > "Facts don't cease to be facts, but news ceases to be news". > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
