On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 22:11 +0100, David Gerard wrote: > On 25 May 2011 09:46, Gordon Joly <gordon.j...@pobox.com> wrote: > > > I think that the Wikimepdia community should be glad that the Twitter > > exposure and the question in Parliament (under parliamentary privilege) > > deflected interest away from the Wikipedia entry.
> > Although the original Telegraph journalist/editor didn't quote it, I > did say in talking to the journalist that UK editors would be liable > personally for edits they made :-) For future reference: _Wiki editors in England and Wales_ - provided the super-injunction holder has not been granted corresponding restraint by the Scottish Courts. Legal advice provided to Wikinewsies indicates they'd have a great deal of trouble getting that from the courts here - or prosecuting because someone broke some silly English judge's ruling. -- Brian McNeil. -- brian.mcn...@wikinewsie.org | Wikinews Accredited Reporter. http://en.wikinews.org | http://www.wikinewsie.org "Facts don't cease to be facts, but news ceases to be news". _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
