If people on-wiki are being snitty, I'd recommend going straight to OTRS, Via them the charity can point out relevant links to counter any undue weight as-opposed to trying to remove content.
It does carry a lot more weight if OTRS volunteers bring up legitimate new sources on the talk and ask these incorporated to eliminate any bias. Brian McNeil -- Wikinews, Accredited Reporter. Personal: [email protected] "Facts don't cease to be facts, but news ceases to be news." > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Charity outreach favour > From: Thomas Dalton <[email protected]> > Date: Fri, August 12, 2011 4:58 pm > To: [email protected] > > > If you don't find any luck here, OTRS are good at this kind of thing. > > On 12 August 2011 17:39, Chris Keating <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > A charity I know is trying to update its wikipedia entry to deal with what > > they see as a case of WP:UNDUE, and finding they are getting snapped at > > on-wiki. > > I was wondering if someone might be prepared to help them find appropriate > > ways of improving the article. > > I would offer myself if the charity concerned wasn't my employer ;-) > > If you can help, please drop me a line. > > Chris > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikimedia UK mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
