On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Charles Matthews < charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> Well, if WS is paying for proofing ... I do about 35 hours a week > currently, so I'd be interested. Seriously, WS doesn't have the sort of > profile (point 1) that is likely to attract this sort of support. But also > (point 2) WS is in a more crowded market than WP, given that there are other > and indeed larger text repositories and ways to get proofreading done. > > Viz "attracting this sort of support", I meant from Wikimedia UK. That way WMUK would be able to deliver an end-to-end service within a defined time period. I appreciate that it may be that WMUK would get maximum value for money using an alternative service, but then importing the results. -- Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250).
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
