I think it was certainly a very dick move to impose it on the community -
when the first proposal raised clear objections.

I know we pointed them at RCOM/Foundation at that point, but I don't think
that was with the implicit agreement that whatever they came up with would
be acceptable...

Tom

On 9 December 2011 09:41, Fae <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have raised my concerns for this appearing to be an advert on IRC
> with RCOM the DEV team and then on-wiki with Philippe. RCOM have
> pointed me to the WMF and the WMF said it's not their problem and
> pointed me back to RCOM. There is a claim that the central notice was
> agreed with the community but this does not appear to yet be supported
> with evidence.
>
> I have raised my personal opinion at
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:ANI#Harvard.2FScience_Po_Adverts>
> where any of my fellow Wikipedians are free to add their own.
>
> Note, during the IRC chat it was pointed out to me that Google or a
> telecoms company could easily be next, there is no restriction for
> central notices of this type on what logos or other forms of
> advertising they might carry under a claim that this would make the
> sponsorship arrangement clear. Considering Jimbo's statements that
> Wikipedia will never carry advertising, I think this puts us all in an
> uncomfortable position.
>
> Thanks,
> Fae
> --
> http://enwp.org/user_talk:fae
> Guide to email tags: http://j.mp/faetags
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to