On Mar 9, 2012 2:35 PM, "Michael Peel" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 9 Mar 2012, at 14:32, Tom Morris wrote: > > > On 9 March 2012 13:48, Charles Matthews <[email protected]> wrote: > >> http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/who-are-the-commons-moles-changing-wikipedia-entries-7545991.html > >> > > > > Headline: "Who are the Commons moles changing Wikipedia entries?" > > > > My initial thought was "Commons people aren't allowed to edit > > Wikipedia?" (and also something along the lines of "well, we know > > Commons people like their 'nude or semi-nude women with Muppets', but > > even so, calling them 'moles' seems a bit harsh!"). > > > > Then I grokked that it was the House of Commons, not Wikimedia Commons. > > > > Too much time at the coal face, methinks. > > I thought exactly the same thing, followed by "ooh, there's a Wikimedia Commons article on page 3 of the Independent! Fantastic!". Should have known better. ;-) > > Mike >
What I read: "There's a Wikimedia Commons picture on page 3!" Anyone takers on Commons for the challenge? ;) > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
