I'm not sure if you all know, but this week, thanks primarily to the hard work 
of User:Ocaasi, the first tranche of free HighBeam memberships were given out 
to active Wikimedians - see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:HighBeam 

I applied and got one. I've been noodling around with the database finding 
sources for all sorts of things. One thing that stands out: the huge quantity 
of local newspaper sources, and the huge deficit of sources in Wikipedia 
articles about British schools.

Our school articles are basically a holding pan for vandalism, often of the 
tediously oversightable sort ("such and such in class 9D is gay and here's his 
mobile number"), but they also often have almost no sources and say nothing 
even vaguely interesting: usually they cite their OFSTED report, the official 
school page, and perhaps a page on a central government or LEA website.

Due to a lack of sourcing, we have no reason to trust changes that are made on 
the articles: on school articles I've watched, head teachers have changed, even 
the name of the school has changed, and we haven't the sources to really 
justify or revert those changes.

With access to some decent sources, we can actually fix lots of these articles. 
While they may still continue to be the target of vandalism and unsourced 
changes, there can at least be a decent well-sourced core of useful information.

If you are a UK Wikipedian and have just been given access to HighBeam, go find 
your old (or current) school or the schools near where you live and fix up the 
sources! Same for any other community institution: libraries, pubs, scout 
troops, churches etc. 

-- 
Tom Morris
<http://tommorris.org/>



_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to