+1

Richard Symonds, Wikimedia UK
On Jun 8, 2012 10:16 AM, "Tom Morris" <[email protected]> wrote:

> At risk of sounding trollish, unappreciative or rude, can I suggest that
> in talking about the successes of Wikimedia UK, less focus should be given
> on the meta-charity stuff, important though it is, but on the thing which
> the charity's existence has enabled. There's plenty of it: GLAM outreach,
> other forms of outreach (Monmouth!), the Wikimania bids and so on.
>
>
> Internal governance is important, but think about other charities. The
> reason anyone gets excited about any charity is the actual work they do
> rather than the governance stuff they do in order to let them do the actual
> work.
>
> And I say that with the greatest of respect to the people who have put
> enormous amounts of work into making Wikimedia UK work and doing all that
> very important and necessary meta-work! ;-)
>
> --
> Tom Morris
> <http://tommorris.org/>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to