Thanks for the update, Joscelyn. Andreas
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 12:52 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the suggestions and views about whether/what sort of submission > WMUK should make to the consultation on the CDB. > > There isn't a 'response' to comment on at the moment as we agreed as a > Board > on Thursday night that WMUK should go ahead and make a submission to the > consultation. The Board agreed that we should keep the WMUK response brief, > more to raise a flag about the Bill needing reconsideration, rather than a > full blown detailed response of the type Open Rights Group is likely to > submit. > > I will only get time to work on a response towards the end of next week &/ > weekend while being conscious of the deadline of 23rd August. If anyone > would like to kick-start things prior to then, that would be great. > > Thanks, > Joscelyn > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > [email protected] > Sent: 04 August 2012 13:01 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Wikimediauk-l Digest, Vol 85, Issue 26 > > Send Wikimediauk-l mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than > "Re: Contents of Wikimediauk-l digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Request from Open Rights Group (Martin Poulter) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2012 12:14:30 +0100 > From: Martin Poulter <[email protected]> > To: UK Wikimedia mailing list <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Request from Open Rights Group > Message-ID: > <CABCnYt38=vc7cBLBP0qneBBa-L9u= > [email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Asking people to comment on something they haven't seen would indeed be > unreasonable. Fortunately, Jon did something entirely different: > inviting those interested to get in touch with the person who will write > the > response. Why not take up the suggestion? > > On 3 August 2012 20:41, geni <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 3 August 2012 13:43, Jon Davies <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I sent this around a while back. > >> The ORG would like our support. > >> > >> Joscelyn Upendram is preparing a simple reponse on our behalf, if > >> anyone wants to offer her ideas contact her directly > >> > >> Jon Davies. > > > > Its unreasonable to expect people to comment without at least a rough > > idea of what response is being prepared. > > > > > > > > -- > > geni > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikimedia UK mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > > > > -- > Dr Martin L Poulter > Wikipedia contributor http://enwp.org/User:MartinPoulter > Wikimedia UK contributor http://uk.wikimedia.org/ > Musician http://myspace.com/comapilot > Person http://infobomb.org/ > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimediauk-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > > > End of Wikimediauk-l Digest, Vol 85, Issue 26 > ********************************************* > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
