On 8 September 2012 17:28, Nikita Belavate <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hii All, > > I read the letter by author Philip Roth about *Reliable Sources* on > Wikipedia and his unrest about the article on his book* 'The Human Stain' > *a while ago and just saw this discussion initiated here. > Here's the Open letter written by Roth : > http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/books/2012/09/an-open-letter-to-wikipedia.html?mobify=0 > > There is the usual type of internal debate going on about this. As far as I can understand the actual crux, Roth has a point to the extent that an OTRS mail (I guess - he says letter) talked about "secondary sources" when in this case WP:SELFSOURCE<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SELFSOURCE> applies, clearly enough. Charles > >
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
