I disagree that it is in fairly good shape and would welcome an opportunity for further discussion. A bad long-term plan can be worse than no plan. On Sep 28, 2012 11:01 PM, "Andrew Turvey" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I appreciate that recent events have overtaken things to an extent but I > wondered what the status is with > http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/2012_Five_Year_Plan? On the page ist says "This > version will be discussed at a special board meeting to be held during > Wikimania in Washington" - did that happen? > > It seems in fairly good shape, although it could do with a section saying > how progress towards achieving the plan will be reviewed. The best thing > may be to adopt it as is until the next review. > > We do five year plans at our work and they work in a rolling format - i.e. > each year you do another five year plan based on the last and extending out > another year. This works fairly well and I'd recommend it as an approach. > > -- > Andrew Turvey > -- > 07403 216 991 > @AndrewTurvey <https://twitter.com/#!/AndrewTurvey> > http://www.facebook.com/andrew.turvey > http://en.wikipedia.org/User:AndrewRT > http://englishwikipedian.blogspot.co.uk/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > >
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
