On Sep 29, 2012 9:58 PM, "James Farrar" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Then the statement should have been more honest...

This is politics. It's how the game is played. You avoid a mutually harmful
fight by allowing the weaker party to save face by pretending it was their
decision.
On Sep 29, 2012 9:58 PM, "James Farrar" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Then the statement should have been more honest...
> On Sep 29, 2012 9:41 PM, "Thomas Dalton" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I think it is fairly obvious that this was a WMF decision.
>> On Sep 29, 2012 9:33 PM, "James Farrar" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Whoever decided that UK donations to the fundraiser wouldn't be Gift Aid
>>> eligible. According to the statement, that's both WMF and WMUK.
>>> On Sep 29, 2012 8:59 PM, "WereSpielChequers" <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> James, if you are accusing a charity of throwing away money could you
>>>> be specific as to which charity you are accusing of throwing away money?
>>>>
>>>> I'm not aware of any of WMUK's financial decisions being disputed.
>>>>
>>>> By contrast the WMF by processing the payments for this years
>>>> fundraiser will lose the movement as a whole hundreds of thousands of
>>>> pounds.  This is partly because they are not a UK registered charity and
>>>> WMUK is, so Gift Aid of probably more than £100,000 won't be achieved, but
>>>> I suspect that even more will be lost because as a US organisation they
>>>> can't collect by direct debits. Over the next few decades that will lose
>>>> the movement several times as much as the foregone Gift Aid money.
>>>>
>>>> However the WMF doesn't have a formal membership structure, or at least
>>>> not one I'm aware of. So were you suggesting that WMUK has been throwing
>>>> away money?
>>>>
>>>> WSC
>>>>
>>>> On 29 September 2012 13:20, James Farrar <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Indeed, and for now I remain a member.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is subject to finding out precisely why the charity is
>>>>> voluntarily throwing away money.
>>>>> On Sep 28, 2012 11:11 PM, "Deryck Chan" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> There is, an will always be, the option to donate to WMUK rather than
>>>>>> WMF even if WMUK isn't the default payment processor anymore.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What I can certainly see is a fragmented 2012 fundraiser, with
>>>>>> certain donors staying with WMUK and others switching to WMF because 
>>>>>> that's
>>>>>> where the default landing page now points them to. Lots of returning 
>>>>>> donors
>>>>>> will be very very confused either because they can't gift-aid their
>>>>>> donations, or because two "Wikipedia organisations" are asking for their
>>>>>> money at the same time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 28 September 2012 22:50, James Farrar <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, there goes my donation.
>>>>>>> On Sep 28, 2012 9:16 PM, "David Gerard" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 28 September 2012 21:14, Chris Keating <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > I'd like to draw to your attention this joint statement with the
>>>>>>>> Foundation
>>>>>>>> > which I have just, with the authority of the Board, posted on our
>>>>>>>> blog
>>>>>>>> > regarding the management of conflicts of interests and this year's
>>>>>>>> > fundraiser.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> http://blog.wikimedia.org.uk/2012/09/joint-statement-from-wikimedia-foundation-and-wikimedia-uk/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Right, so money->SF and so much for Gift Aid?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - d.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Wikimedia UK mailing list
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
>>>>>>>> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Wikimedia UK mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
>>>>>>> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Wikimedia UK mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
>>>>>> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Wikimedia UK mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
>>>>> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Wikimedia UK mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
>>>> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikimedia UK mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
>>> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia UK mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
>> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to