It would be good to see the actual proposal before jumping to conclusions. Shaming somebody based on hearsay is rather unfair... On Oct 6, 2012 5:37 PM, "Katie Chan" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Fae has opened a discussion on the UK wiki water cooler on a current > discussions within WMUK Board to institute a concept of collective > responsibility[1]. > > This is an absolutely horrendous proposal and goes right against the heart > of the principles of openness and transparency which underpins the > Wikimedia movement, and upon which Wikimedia UK was founded on. Even the > WMF Board now list individual trustees' votes on a resolution[2]. This is > nothing more than a half-assed attempt to hide division within the heart of > the current board of trustees that only serve to reduce accountability of > individual trustee and damages the chapter. > > Whoever proposed this, shame on you! > > KTC > > [1]: <http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/**Water_cooler#Trustees_and_.** > 22cabinet_voting.22<http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Water_cooler#Trustees_and_.22cabinet_voting.22> > > > [2]: <http://wikimediafoundation.**org/wiki/Resolution:Board_of_** > Trustees_Voting_Transparency<http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolution:Board_of_Trustees_Voting_Transparency> > > > > -- > Experience is a good school but the fees are high. > - Heinrich Heine > > ______________________________**_________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l<http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l> > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
