I'm not party to the negotiations, and of course things being discussed there could be very different to what has been announced publicly. But unless I've missed something Roger has publicly offered to give the technology and another domain to the community, however he has said he is keeping QRpedia.org. So we as a community need to discontinue using QRpedia as a brand.
Obviously that is unfortunate, but we should not look a gift horse in the mouth, what Roger and his associates have created and are giving to the community is very useful, we have no right to complain that they are being less generous than some might like. WSC On 20 January 2013 21:58, Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote: > On 20 January 2013 20:07, WereSpielChequers <werespielchequ...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Would I be correct in understanding that you are intending to retain the > > QRpedia website and presumably brand? If so presumably we will need a new > > brand for our QR codes and should stop using the term QRpedia except when > > referring to the site currently used to generate QR codes? > > Given how well-known - and respected - that name has become, that > would be a terribly retrograde step. > > -- > Andy Mabbett > @pigsonthewing > http://pigsonthewing.org.uk > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
