I put discussing the WCA on this weekend's board meeting agenda a while back. 
However, the context has obviously changed a lot now. I've just added an agenda 
item about the current situation, which will hopefully be accepted by the rest 
of the board. Fæ's already agreed to provide an update at the meeting.

Thanks,
Mike

On 6 Feb 2013, at 23:08, Andrew Turvey <[email protected]> wrote:

> That's an interesting way of putting it! However, now that the WMF has come 
> out against, is there any way that the WCA can fulfill its stated aims? 
> Furthermore, if WMUK continues to support the WCA, will this damage the 
> chapter's relationship with the Foundation?
> 
> On Feb 6, 2013 9:12 PM, "Thomas Dalton" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 6 February 2013 21:07, Andrew Turvey <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I see the Foundation has withdrawn their support for the Wikimedia Chapters
> > Association, the cross-chapters partnership that WMUK backed.
> 
> To be honest, it never really offered any support in the first
> place... they said they liked the idea, but that's as far as it got.
> They haven't withdrawn their support, they've said they aren't going
> to be giving any support - subtly different!
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to