I feel we have a very real need for the phrase WMUK volunteer. Firstly, as i have mentioned before, I am not sure that the term "volunteer" is the best generic term for WM editors - I feel amateur bet captures the relationship, although indeed often people volunteer for specific tasks.
With WMUK Volunteers I think we can be quite clear about what this means: people who offer to do tasks within the framework of a WMUk programme with out pay. Please check: https://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Training_the_Trainers/Agreement_for_trainers which says: "Wikimedia UK will ensure that their trainers are adequately covered for public liability insurance when training, facilitating or attending meetings on behalf of Wikimedia UK." This is quite different from being a WM editor where a person is completely self-directed, not structured in a programme and not protected by insurance - i.e an amateur. That is why I think using different words is useful: to convey different meanings. My own view on Wikimania 2014 is that it should be set up as a separate company, with WMUK as a corporate member on the board. Thought needs to go into what is the best form for it: e.g. Community Interest Company might be the most appropriate. This relates to how it is going to be funded. Having a separate company means that if anything goes wrong, it doesn't take WMUK down with it, nor does it uncontrollably swallow up all WMUK's attention. all the best Fabian (User:Leutha) > Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 08:26:56 +0000 > From: Charles Matthews <[email protected]> > To: UK Wikimedia mailing list <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Wikimania 2014 in London. > Message-ID: > <CAEgLstTU_C=vMEeUkCrdAcVi2xmG1NHBdP==3oBhxk_U0PuR=w...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On 18 March 2013 23:16, Thomas Dalton <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 18 March 2013 23:10, Katie Chan <[email protected]> wrote: >>> In this case, the bid isn't being submitted by volunteers and members >>> of >>> Wikimedia UK as part of Wikimedia UK. >> >> The bid is funded by WMUK, the bid team are operating out of the WMUK >> office and the intention is for everything to be booked and paid for >> in the name of WMUK. Explain to me how this isn't a WMUK bid... > > I am unfamiliar with the concept of a "WMUK volunteer". Wikimedian > volunteers who happen to be in the UK may have no connection at all to > WMUK, and throwing the phrase around is unhelpful. > > Charles _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
