So that's what the paragraph in the i was about - it didn't mention paid editors. Glad to see an explanation. Doug
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Edward Hands <[email protected]> wrote: > Knew about Antandrus, but not Raul's Laws. Thanks. > > From today's Guardian, " Wikipedia cracks down on 'paid advocacy editing > and sockpuppetry' ": > > http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/oct/22/wikipedia-ban-sock-puppet-pr > > Only six comments so far, if anyone wants to weigh in. > > Edward Hands > (Edwardx) > > Sorry about that. Thanks for spotting that Charles. > On 22 Oct 2013 13:05, "Charles Matthews" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> On 22 October 2013 12:35, Stevie Benton >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Hello everyone, >>> >>> I've just encountered a Wikipedia essay from a user called Antandrus. >>> It's from 2006/7 or so initially but much of it still holds true. >>> >>> It may be familiar to you but thought you might like it, too - >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Antandrus/observations_on_Wikipedia_behavior >>> >>> >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Antandrus/observations_on_Wikipedia_behavior<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Antandrus/observations_on_Wikipedia_behavior> >> >> >> for the thing itself, rather than the talk page. The grand-daddy of >> such lists is of course >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Raul%27s_laws >> >> Charles >> > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > > -- Doug Weller http://www.ramtops.co.uk
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
