On 10 February 2014 20:57, Thomas Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
[your quoting is broken] >> Creating lots of stubs with minimal or no sourcing > > Who did that? > > Well there's a list of some on AN/I - It's not the end of the world sort of > list, but still enough to warrant a reminder. You've gone from "lots" to "some". The answer to my question therefore appears to be "no-one". Any particular reason for your inaccurate hyperbole? > Especially as there are quite > of lot of MEP's... Irrelevant. >> tags being off-putting to newbies > > No you don't; I said no such thing. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pigsonthewing&diff=prev&oldid=594703107 Confirming that I said no such thing. Any reason for your inaccurate statement? >> the rules are in place > > Feel free to point to any "rules" that you think I broke. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BLP#Proposed_deletion_of_biographies_of_living_people So no rules broken, then. >or it can be proposed for deletion. none of the articles in question was proposed for deletion. Also, you missed the bit about "the article may be deleted *after ten days*" (my emphasis) > What are your thoughts on all this? Do you disagree? Do you have an > alternative perspective? Do you have any sort of reflection? Yes; people should stop making false statements, tilting at windmills, issuing empty treats and - as I pointed out earlier - being dickish. -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
