Hi Andy, That rationale makes sense, unless the image was of something more permanent, or of something that's still there with no expectations of being removed? Is there an enwp article here?
Thanks, Mike On 17 Feb 2014, at 20:42, Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote: > Photographers active in the UK may be interested in this successful > deletion proposal: > > > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Horse_at_Water_-_Marble_Arch.JPG > > made on the basis that "the sculpture was not permanent, but > temporary. It was commissioned for Daylesford in Gloucestershire, but > at first stood in 2009 temporarily in London. There is no freedom of > panorama in England for temporary sculptures and therefore the license > is invalid." > > I intend to call for undeletion. > > -- > Andy Mabbett > @pigsonthewing > http://pigsonthewing.org.uk > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
