Creating a set of moderation guidelines to cover the few people on moderation on this list is not really an efficient use of my time. I would imagine most people feel the same way.
Dan On 24 July 2014 10:57, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote: > You're on moderation because you have (a) moderated your posting > behaviour here, where you are on moderation (b) continued to post in > this manner elsewhere, where you are not on moderation. > > This strongly suggests that moderation is the only thing keeping your > posting behaviour acceptable. > > Remember that the actual point is to make the list not toxic. So far, > it appears moderation is doing that job. > > I have noted that I am not personally inclined to remove the > moderation, but that if any other moderator did I wouldn't object. So > far none have done so, and instead have concurred with the above > analysis. > > Nobody has a right to post to this list. But so far every post you've > made while on moderation has gone through. > > > - d. > > > > On 23 July 2014 11:41, Fæ <[email protected]> wrote: > > Re: > http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mailing_lists/Guidelines#Second_attempt_at_Moderation_guideline_.28July_2014.29 > > > > Based on a thread I started at Wikimedia-l, the above general > > guideline for email list moderation is being improved above, ensuring > > better transparency of list moderation. I am hoping that Wikimediauk-l > > will adopt this as best practice. Please do take part on meta if you > > have some thoughts about improvement. > > > > I have been moderated on this list for quite a while now, I guess it > > will be forever unless a guideline for appeals is adopted. My > > moderation was not started for any post on this list, the explanation > > I had from David, was that he personally did not like my posts to > > Wikimedia-l and so responded by moderating me here (I have never been > > moderated on any other list than this one). > > > > A key disadvantage to moderation is that my emails to this regularly > > take 2 days to get posted, so I am not inclined to take part in any > > active discussion - instead I just post off-list or have used > > Wikimedia-l or one of the other lists that volunteers interested in > > the same projects as me take part in. I have never had an email not > > get posted, they just confusingly appear "pre-dated" as if they were > > posted when I sent them. Of course there are advantages in spending > > more time in other places rather than a UK centric email list, so it's > > swings and roundabouts. > > > > Fae > > -- > > [email protected] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikimedia UK mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > > WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk >
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
