I feel I should note that these accounts are still subject to audit and *are
not final*. It's important to remember that because they may change as we
go through our back-and-forth with the auditors about how best to account
for things.

Richard Symonds
Wikimedia UK
0207 065 0992

Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and
Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered
Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT.
United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia
movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who
operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects).

*Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control
over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.*

On 24 March 2015 at 14:06, Thomas Morton <[email protected]>
wrote:

> It strikes me that the only non programme overspend is related to Jon
> leaving. Given the troublesome financial state, and the boards fiduciary
> duty, perhaps they need to explain in detail why this happened and why no
> effort was made to defer it to the next financial year when it could have
> been accounted for?
>
> Tom
> On 24 Mar 2015 13:15, "Michael Maggs" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> *Draft annual accounts for the 2014-15 financial year *Today we are
>> releasing our draft annual accounts for the 2014-15 financial year, ending
>> 31st January 2015 [1]. The contents of these accounts have been a matter
>> of significant concern for the Board, and we are making this statement to
>> provide some context and to set out the steps we have taken.
>>
>> In December 2013 the board approved a budget for 2014-15 based on
>> expected income of £623,000. Net income over the period was in line with
>> expectations but expenditure on Wikimania and other projects was not well
>> controlled during the latter part of last year, and we are facing a
>> projected deficit of £192,000 as against our original budgeted deficit
>> of £32,000.
>>
>> While Wikimania 2014 was an international success, for which volunteers,
>> the Wikimedia Foundation and Wikimedia UK can all take some credit, the
>> experience was challenging for us as the local chapter. Although we were
>> not running the conference, we were providing significant staff and
>> logistical support, and we did so too enthusiastically given that not all
>> of our expenses were recoverable. Overall, and after allowing for a one-off
>> Foundation grant of £65,000 to cover our international support, we
>> overspent by around £45,000.
>>
>> Our Wikimedians in Residence programme gained real traction over the year
>> with demand significantly outstripping available funds, resulting in an
>> overspend of £49,000. Much of this arose from agreements made with several
>> high-profile organisations late last year which could not have been
>> deferred without significant reputational damage to the charity. The board
>> had hoped that these costs could have been delayed until February, when
>> they would have fallen into the 2015-16 financial year, but have been
>> advised that that is not possible.
>>
>> There were smaller overspends on a variety of other project areas as well.
>>
>> Finally, we had an off-budget net expense of £57,000 during the year,
>> representing the Chief Executive transition.
>>
>> These disappointing overspends in 2014-15 have left us with reserves of
>> only £165,000, which is below the £200,000 level that the board considers
>> to be the acceptable minimum for a charity of our size.
>>
>>
>>  *Action to restore stability*
>>
>> Immediately that the charity's overspends became clear, shortly before
>> the December 2014 board meeting, the interim CEO, supported by the board,
>> introduced a moratorium on further non-essential expenditure until a
>> 2015-16 budget could be prepared. In order to allow time for the interim
>> CEO to review activity the second volunteer strategy day as well as a
>> number of other projected programme activities were postponed.
>>
>>
>>  *Draft budget and plans for 2015-16*
>>
>> We are also today releasing our draft budget for 2015-16 [2]. This is
>> subject to amendment, particularly on staff costs.
>>
>> The funds we have available to spend on charitable programmes will be
>> significantly lower than in 2014-15. There are three main factors:
>>
>>    -
>>
>>    To ensure charity stability it is crucial that we increase our
>>    reserves to the minimum level of around £200,000. The board has set a core
>>    budget for this year which is break-even or better.
>>    -
>>
>>    Our grant from the Wikimedia Foundation has been reduced from £353,000
>>    to £314,000.
>>    -
>>
>>    For the moment at least the board does not consider it prudent to set
>>    a budget that assumes in advance that the charity will be able to obtain
>>    significant project-based or corporate funding, nor that direct debit
>>    income can be rapidly increased.
>>
>> The combined effect of these factors is that the board has to take
>> decisive and fairly radical action to ensure that we can work effectively
>> within our smaller core budget of £570,000 (a full £242,000 below the
>> amount indicated as WMUK's projected budget in the FDC bid of October
>> 2014).
>>
>> To ensure greater clarity and transparency for the future, as well as
>> better alignment with our strategic goals, our 2015-16 budget will be
>> split into a variety of categories, of which the first three ('contracted',
>> 'necessary' and 'should') cover limited core activities that can be
>> supported within the resources (funds, staff, volunteers etc) we are almost
>> certain to have available. The remaining two categories ('like to' and
>> 'icing') cover activities that we can support only to the extent we can
>> expand our resource base, either by specific project-based or general 
>> fundraising,
>> or by building active volunteer engagement.
>>
>> Our aim with this project-based approach is to encourage community
>> involvement with decisions on what we should do and not do, based on an
>> assessment of which potential projects are best aligned with our strategic
>> goals. A large part of the assessment must be to decide which projects are
>> capable of generating sufficient active volunteer support (and fundability
>> if funds are needed), and then selecting based on those giving the
>> greatest charitable impact for the resources required.
>>
>> We will need some new community mechanisms to embed volunteer inputs into
>> all of this, and we will be discussing widely, including further
>> discussions at the rescheduled second volunteer strategy day on Saturday 25
>> th July.
>>
>>
>>  *WMUK organisational structure*
>>
>> In their comments of November last year the Funds Dissemination
>> Committee (FDC) said:
>>
>> “*While the FDC understands that reducing Wikimedia UK’s funding might
>> be a strain on the organization, the FDC hopes it will lead to a productive
>> re-evaluation of priorities and direction. The ED transition should be seen
>> as an opportunity to rethink and restructure. The governance reshuffle and
>> adaptation has been managed well, recommendations brought about by the
>> governance review have been implemented, and board diversity has been
>> achieved, which will provide a strong foundation for the coming transition.
>> At the same time, the FDC notes that it seems difficult to identify a
>> sustainable and clear staff structure beneath the executive level.”*
>>
>> It is clear to the board that many of the assumptions and plans on which
>> the current organisational structure was originally built are no longer
>> fit for purpose. As previously announced, we are already engaged in a
>> review of our staff structure. This is currently in a period of
>> consultation with the staff concerned and it would be inappropriate to
>> discuss in detail. However, the Board’s intention is to have a more
>> streamlined organisation, better focused on our strategic goals, better
>> able to engage with and involve volunteers of all kinds, and more
>> appropriate to the level of resource we have.
>>
>> The committee further noted:
>>
>> “*The FDC urges Wikimedia UK to carefully consider its plans to hire
>> additional fundraising staff, and to articulate a clear strategy for how
>> that position will benefit the organization and the movement. The FDC
>> acknowledges that there may be many untapped resources in Wikimedia UK’s
>> context, but resources will need to be clearly identified in order to be
>> targeted effectively.”*
>>
>> The board believes that the charity's existing capacity and model for
>> fundraising is not adequate, and we cannot at present recommend a core
>> budget that assumes significant project-based or general contributions from
>> trusts, foundations and corporates. The board is seeking a permanent Chief
>> Executive with significant expertise in this area, and who is capable of 
>> taking
>> a stronger personal lead within a restructured staff team.
>>
>> ____________
>> Michael Maggs
>> Chair, Wikimedia UK
>> on behalf of the board
>>
>>
>> [1]:
>> https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/File:Draft_statutory_accounts_2014-15_as_at_March_2015.pdf
>> [2]:
>> https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/File:Draft_2015-16_budget_for_board_meeting_of_7_March_2015.pdf
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia UK mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
>> WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk

Reply via email to