My interpretation of the rules is that it would be paid editing so you
would have to declare who is paying you on your user page or edit summary
or the talk page for pages you edit

Paid editing by glam staff about their institutions is frowned on as COI -
conflict of interest - but editing articles in your area of expertise is
generally not COI. Editing stuff about your collection is generally not
COI  but be careful.

Look at contributing to Commons and wikidata as well as English Wikipedia.
Look at
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_sum_of_all_paintings

Hope this helps

Joe

On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 13:22 Daria Cybulska <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Have a look at the message from Rosa below - she's looking for some advice
> on contributing to Wikipedia relating to collections she is representing.
> If anyone is in the area and/or is interested in helping our, feel free to
> get in touch! It sounds like she's already done a fair amount of research,
> so may only need a bit of support.
>
> All the best,
> Daria
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Rosa Sadler <[email protected]>
> Date: 23 September 2015 at 09:08
> Subject: Contributing to articles on Wikipedia using materials at National
> Fairground Archive
> To: [email protected]
>
>
> Dear GLAM UK,
>
> I am a member of staff in the Library at the University of Sheffield. The
> National Fairground Archive is based within the Library and we are
> interested in using our subject knowledge and collections to contribute to
> Wikipedia articles relating to this area. We understand the policy about
> not contributing original research and would not be doing this.
>
> I have looked at your pages on Wikipedia and have seen the information
> about Wikipedia projects and Wikimedians in residence and I want to ask: is
> it a requirement that we be part of a project with a pre-existing
> Wikimedian or is it ok for members of staff here to become editors and make
> contributions independently? Would this be seen as a conflict of interest?
>
> We would, of course, be using individual accounts and obeying the
> guidelines for editors. Our aim in contributing would be to make
> information about this area more available to the public by adding to
> articles and to provide links (in citations) to our collections so that the
> general public can further benefit from them.
>
> I am interested to hear whether this kind of activity would be acceptable
> to the Wikipedia community and as such I look forward to your response.
>
> Best wishes,
> Rosa
> ​ Sadler​
>
>
>
> *Library Information Services Coordinator*The Diamond
> University Library
> University of Sheffield
> [email protected]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Daria Cybulska - Head of Programmes and Evaluation, Wikimedia UK
> +44 (0) 207 065 0994
> +44 7803 505 170
> --
>
> Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and
> Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered
> Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT.
> United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia
> movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who
> operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects).
>
> *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control
> over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.*
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk

Reply via email to