David, We definitely should nominate 10 photos for the international finals. I would suggest the 3 National winners, the 3 Western Cape winners and 4 more.
Criteria for quality images are very strict. Possibly one or two of the competition photos will pass that selection, but I doubt overall the image quality was not all that good. I would however suggest that we submit some for Values Images and Featured Pictures. They still need to be technically good photos, but quality criteria is lower as these focus more of the image subject and content. There was definitely a couple of WOW photos entered during the competition that will be perfect for Featured Pictures. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Valued_images http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:FPC Nick On Friday, 16 November 2012 06:02:09 David Richfield wrote: > Hi all, > > I've added our winning pictures at > http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2012_winners#South_Af > rica . > > I don't have time to complete the job, though: > > 1) Do we have a list of finalists? > 2) Check out > http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Winners_of_Wiki_Loves_Monuments_ > 2012_in_Germany - what categories should we create? One for winers, one for > runners-up? > 3) We should probably nominate them as "quality images" (like "good > article, but for pictures"). > http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Quality_images > > -- > David Richfield > [[:en:User:Slashme]] > +27718539985 > > _______________________________________________ > WikimediaZA mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaza _______________________________________________ WikimediaZA mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaza
