That did the trick. Thank you, Dan!
— James Hare President, Wikimedia DC http://wikimediadc.org @wikimediadc On Thursday, March 19, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Dan Andreescu wrote: > I see the potential problem then. James, try something else for me: > > Instead of Rolling Active Editor, which is a heavy and scary metric, try > using Edits with: > > Start: June 1st 2014 > End: October 1st 2014 > Time Series by: month > Namespaces: if you leave this blank, it will get all namespaces, which sounds > like what you're looking for > > Then you can look at the CSV result and do some quick analysis on which > editors had 5+ edits per month. The "Time Series by" parameter is key there. > > Just so you don't think I'm making you a test subject, I tried this myself > for 2 months of data and the report finished quickly. So I'm confident that > it will work, but let us know if you have trouble. > > Also, while running Rolling Active Editor we ran into performance issues and > failures as we predicted above. This is an infrastructure issue that's very > tricky to fix, so there's probably nothing we can do in the short term. > Either way we've opened a ticket and are looking at the problem: > https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T93217 > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Kevin Leduc <ke...@wikimedia.org > (mailto:ke...@wikimedia.org)> wrote: > > I am Kevin (Product Manager for the Analytics team) and I am keeping an eye > > on this thread and what we could do better. > > > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Edward Galvez <egal...@wikimedia.org > > (mailto:egal...@wikimedia.org)> wrote: > > > Sorry - I meant Dan! > > > > > > And thanks for the clarification James (those metrics make sense) > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:44 AM, James Hare <james.h...@wikidc.org > > > (mailto:james.h...@wikidc.org)> wrote: > > > > (Who’s Kevin?) > > > > > > > > For Rolling Active Editor, I decided to chunk it into month-long > > > > periods. So I am trying the first one for 30 days prior to June 1, > > > > 2014. Yet that report nonetheless failed. > > > > > > > > The report for newly registered worked out just fine. > > > > > > > > > > > > — > > > > James Hare > > > > President, Wikimedia DC > > > > http://wikimediadc.org > > > > @wikimediadc > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, March 19, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Edward Galvez wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi James and Kevin, > > > > > > > > > > Here are the global metrics specifications for newly registered and > > > > > active editors involved for wmf grantees. James, please let us know > > > > > if you are looking for other metrics or if these are what you need. I > > > > > ask because the metrics you are specifying sound different. > > > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Learning_patterns/Number_of_newly_registered_users > > > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Learning_patterns/Number_of_active_editors_involved > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > Edward > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 19, 2015, at 9:42 AM, James Hare <james.h...@wikidc.org > > > > > (mailto:james.h...@wikidc.org)> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Rolling new active editor may not be the metric I need. Just, for > > > > > > that period of time, I need to know which of the editors were > > > > > > active editors (5+ edits/month) and which had created their > > > > > > accounts in that period. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > James > > > > > > > > > > > > — > > > > > > James Hare > > > > > > President, Wikimedia DC > > > > > > http://wikimediadc.org > > > > > > @wikimediadc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, March 19, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Dan Andreescu wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > James, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm cc-ing Jonathan as this issue looks to have two components. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First, James, I ran the Edits metric on your cohort and it worked > > > > > > > ok. I am running the Rolling New Active Editor metric and it > > > > > > > seems a bit slow, so we're looking into that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Second, how exactly are these reports run? Like, are you using > > > > > > > Rolling New Active Editor and doing it in chunks of 30 days over > > > > > > > the period you need? Could you detail this, as these rolling > > > > > > > metrics are very slow and were not really meant for this kind of > > > > > > > use. We can adjust our system accordingly (maybe we can make > > > > > > > faster metrics that get to what you need better). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 5:04 PM, James Hare > > > > > > > <james.h...@wikidc.org (mailto:james.h...@wikidc.org)> wrote: > > > > > > > > I want to know, for a period from July 1 to September 30, which > > > > > > > > of the ~1,300 contributors are new, and which are active > > > > > > > > editors, per the global metrics meanings of those terms. Let me > > > > > > > > know fi you need a list of usernames from me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > James > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > — > > > > > > > > James Hare > > > > > > > > President, Wikimedia DC > > > > > > > > http://wikimediadc.org > > > > > > > > @wikimediadc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Nuria Ruiz wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > James, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There are probably better metrics for your purposes, could > > > > > > > > > you let us know what data are you interested on? Once we know > > > > > > > > > that we can take a look to see if there are any issues with > > > > > > > > > the tool itself. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nuria > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:47 PM, James Hare > > > > > > > > > <james.h...@wikidc.org (mailto:james.h...@wikidc.org)> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I am trying to run a report measuring rolling active editor > > > > > > > > > > and newly registered for a cohort of about ~20,000 accounts > > > > > > > > > > (actually only about ~1,300 Commons usernames, but I opted > > > > > > > > > > to have it extended to their global accounts in case they > > > > > > > > > > also did stuff outside of Commons). I have now tried to run > > > > > > > > > > the report twice and it has failed. Anyone know what is > > > > > > > > > > going on? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > James > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > — > > > > > > > > > > James Hare > > > > > > > > > > President, Wikimedia DC > > > > > > > > > > http://wikimediadc.org > > > > > > > > > > @wikimediadc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > Wikimetrics mailing list > > > > > > > > > > Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org > > > > > > > > > > (mailto:Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org) > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > Wikimetrics mailing list > > > > > > > > > Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org > > > > > > > > > (mailto:Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org) > > > > > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > Wikimetrics mailing list > > > > > > > > Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org > > > > > > > > (mailto:Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org) > > > > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > Wikimetrics mailing list > > > > > > > Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org > > > > > > > (mailto:Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org) > > > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > Wikimetrics mailing list > > > > > > Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org > > > > > > (mailto:Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org) > > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Wikimetrics mailing list > > > > > Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org > > > > > (mailto:Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org) > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Wikimetrics mailing list > > > > Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org (mailto:Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org) > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Edward Galvez > > > Program Evaluation Associate > > > Wikimedia Foundation > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Wikimetrics mailing list > > > Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org (mailto:Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org) > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikimetrics mailing list > > Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org (mailto:Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org) > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimetrics mailing list > Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org (mailto:Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org) > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics > >
_______________________________________________ Wikimetrics mailing list Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics
