There is a discussion open at https://meta.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Coptic_3 - you can add your voice there.
I think though that the problem any wikipedia that relies on a lot of informal speakers of a language is that it can become a chore rather than fun and the entries can look halfhearted. Just look at half a dozen random pages on the Latin Wikipedia https://la.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specialis:Pagina_fortuita Anyway, raise your voice and recruit some editors who will commit a few hours a week. Good luck michael On 11/04/2016, Mit Inspire <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > Given that a number of requests for conlang Wikipedias or Wikipedias for > languages with small numbers of speakers have been made and accepted, a > Coptic Wikipedia does not seem very preposterous. > > I request that a Coptic language Wikipedia be added, so that the growing > number of language revivalists inside and outside Egypt may be able to > practice the language by reading and writing it in its most current form. > _______________________________________________ > Wikipedia-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l > _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
